Ping guo xing wen The issue

Ping guo xing wen

The issue with first ping guo xing wen blu-rays wasnt the resolution they were encoded it. More often than not it was due to the fact that alot of them were encoded in mpeg2 or a really quick and sloppy job using AVC. They were all 1080p I am sure you mean to say, they where encoded. Not, they where encoded it? Right Mr. Encode? The fact remains that there are alot of devices on the market that offer the consumer above HD quality rating hince the plus that you may have misunderstood it was written to say 1080 and above. As one comment states below that you can stream video and it still will not match the quality of blu-ray, due to limitations in data transfer rates or streaming. Enjoy your search for encoded Blu-ray. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest. You are really gonna correct my typo? You know hince isn t a word right? You have no idea what you re talking about here so argue away and prove my point. This is cheap shot paradise brought to you by I am mature enough to discuss the issue without taking cheap shots. And my point of the existence of resolution higher than 1080p? Well there is Ultra HD and my point has been proven above and beyond clarity. Coming to a store near you d0x3 Geez, the teaser is almost as long as the article itself. That being said there is little info here other than sales of Blu-Ray are high and continue to grow. And 3D is in the future of Blu-Ray as the best medium out there. I ve bought most of my blu-rays on amazon for under 10 a piece. I m up to nearly 50 now and to me, it s completely worth it. I now have a good majority of my favorite films and since I ve owned my PS3, I ve had nothing but great HD experiences so far. This was just another Beta vs. VHS battle, cept this time it was HD DVD vs. Blu-Ray. Blu-Ray won and is finally spending their well deserved bragging rights. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest. It was a useless battle. With VHS vs Betamax, one machine couldn t play both media. It s clearly not the case with HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray, as I have a drive installed on my PC which can play and burn both formats. The plus? HD-DVD titles can be picked up for 3 while still giving the same video performance as Blu-Ray. Both sides should have just gotten what they could and pushed for multi-format players. Why have multiple formats and HAVE to buy a player that supports both of them when I can get the great majority of my movies on Blu Ray? Why have an in-dash stereo in your car that supports an iPod AND mp3? Because you can, and because it really shouldn t heavily affect the price. Actually earlier encodings are often crappier than more recent ones, and HD-DVD encodings are often crappier because the discs had less physical space than blu-ray discs which was one of many reasons whey HD-DVD not only lost, but should never ping guo xing wen been pursued to start with. HD-DVD discs are a good bargain but in ten years I m way more likely to be able to play back a Blu-Ray I have full 1080P videos on HD-DVD. Blu-Ray discs have far more storage than what is necessary with excellent video quality and an h. 264 codec. Granted, 3D video takes a lot more room, but we re far from seeing wide implementation of that technology in the home. I ve viewed both on my PC with a nice monitor, and cannot tell the difference not on still frames, not when I zoom in, and certainly not with normal playback. HD-DVD failed to heavily market their technology early on because they offered a full specification and only cost an additional 10% to manufacture, compared to a DVD. The point is that no consumer video would technically be full quality video with zero compression. They both use codecs to compress the video especially red space. Correction, they are now h. 264 so I can watch them in WMC, but not the codec used on disc. Blu-Ray defeated HD-DVD? I wasn t aware of this. What I was aware of is that Sony started throwing a ton of money around to the movie studies to get them to choose Blu-Ray over HD-DVD even as consumers were already choosing HD-DVD over Blu-Ray. I know, I HD-DVD was a better spec you know, a FINISHED ONE, but even though it took Bluray until Rev 0 or 3 whole years to match what HD-DVD did out of the gate, at least they got there. There was nothing about HD-DVD that was better.