Weird science movie part 1 but

Weird science movie part 1

but I went to buy one and couldnt find one easily in Columbus, Ohio. I read at daily tech there was a parts shortage and Daily tech did call some cities and verify there was a real shortag e. I know it did. And I even said it did in my post, but that saying it outsold the 360 since the start of 2008 to show its rising sales long term is also FUD. Which it is given all the other data. Ps3 outsold Xbox 360 in Jan AND Feb. Daily tech reported 360 was back in 2nd place surpassing PS3 3rd place once again for March 0 If I were to get a BR player I would like a standalone personally and know many other people who feel the same way for various reasons: shape the PS3 is not a stackable device, lack of universal remote support I hate that the controller acts as the remote and a harmony remote is not compatible, the lack of on console displays, a BR disc changer would be tough to implement on the PS3, Also, not being a Sanyo, Panasonic, MS, fanboy, but some people just do not want to support Sony if they can avoid doing so, I know my breaking point was the root kit, that was a deal breaker that I wont forget in this lifetime. There are some things money cant find, for everything else theres Google search. That Stacker is really uglynor have I found one that resembles something I would like to show off, and the only remotes available for the PS3 are bluetooth only. Being labelled as a entertainment unit I always found it really sad they could not add a 2 part. I have a PS3 and I have those very same issues with the PS3 as the weird science movie part 1 does that make me a fanboi? Sure 3rd part hardware is available, but these are some of the things Sony really should have thought about when they designed the The stacker is really ugly? If you are more worried about showing off than functionality, then you should not express your complaint publically. Thats more of a personal problem if there is something that fills your needed function but you dont want it because you think its ugly. Honestly I dont think sony was wrong for not including IR, its old technology and its about time more companies include bluetooth for remote control. Much futher range, easy to connect the devices without weird science movie part 1 codes, and does not need direct sight to function. I have a PS3 and I have those very same issues with the PS3 as the other does that make me a fanboi? Read my post again, I was not calling him a fanboi. He stated he did not want Sony because he was a Panasonic, and some other company, fanboy. So I just threw that in the joke. Sure 3rd part hardware is available, but these are some of the things Sony really should have thought about when they designed the A few things to think about, PS3s shape is odd and wont allow you to stack anything right? Do you stack things on your 360 or Wii? I thought That whole stacking argument is a load of crap, why would you stack things on a console in the first place? That whole stacking argument is a load of crap, why would you stack things on a console in the first place? Really? You really need to ask this? Do you think people with entertainment centers prefer to have each console sitting side by side? Your irrational defense of the PS3 obviously paints you as a fanboi. Big time. Really? You really need to ask this? I see no problem is me asking that question. Do you think people with entertainment centers prefer to have each console sitting side by side? You just made me laugh. If you have an entertainment system, why would you be stacking consoles? You should have plenty of space for each console. As mentioned before, why would you be stacking anything on a hot console system? If you want to call something irrational, cluttering the space of a hot electronic weird science movie part 1 is irrational. Oh and it does not take a fanboi to know how to properly handle electronics. You do not put anything with a fan in an enclosed space, and you dont put anything on top of something that produces as much heat as a PS3 or 3