The visitation of mary I m

The visitation of mary

I m just glad the film grossed well worldwide and is selling well on DVD/Blu-Ray. I want another movie!! ARGH! I wish Disney never ever left Narnia!!! How stupid of you to compare it to Tron and Tangled. Disney keeps all profit from those movies, whereas they only kept a margin of the visitation of mary Narnia brought in. You have to look at the bigger picture, both Tron and Tangled will bring in hundreds of millions for Disney over the coming the visitation of mary through merchandise, themeparks, etc. Ways Fox/Walden could only dream of. So no, I m sure Disney is very happy to have dodged the failure that was VDT. It s called GREED peoples. Tangled missed its budget in the US by 61 million the budget was 260 million, and probably far more for marketing and Tron s was 170 the visitation of mary making just over in the US and making 229 million more elsewhere. If Disney did it, the marketing wouldn t have been misfired like it was and more people would have seen it. I m actually surprised people seem to think Tron was successful because Disney considered PC s 55 million opening disappointing and yet Tron opened at 43 million. Although VDT only opened at 24 million, it eventually picked up. I don t about you, but I prefer quality films and how it looked on VDT s home release was DEFINITELY NOT QUALITY! For Tron s international gross, I meant 227 million. Reep: Your forgetting that PC was significantly more expensive than Tron:Legacy. Tribunal: Your forgetting that Disney only paid part of the cost for Narnia as well. Might have only payed a portion of the cost but PC had a production budget of 225 million and another 175 million for marketing. Even if Disney only payed about 1/3 of the cost, it s still a huge number. Reep fails to look beyond box-office numbers. You can t compare Narnia to Tron and Tangled because Disney is in a completely different situation with those films. They had to share all the money generated by the Narnia franchise with Walden, the Lewis Estate, etc And with Tron and Tangled, they get to keep the profit and expand it through merchandise, themeparks, etc. As far as I recall, Tron s theme park rides only came as a part of their huge marketing venture, and at least somebody agrees with me that Disney was wrong to dump Narnia, and when did theme park rides ever come into it, because that is just completely irrelevant. I never said themepark RIDES. That s your word. Since last fall, the stage show ElecTRONica has been playing in Disney s California Adventure. It was a huge success when it began and helped sell merchandise around the park. Narnia doesn t have that. The merchandise is scarce and practically nonexistent. Fox/Walden only have box-office and DVD/Blur-Ray numbers to profit on. It s worth noting that ElecTRONica opened months before Legacy came out. It capitalized, in no small part, on the cult status of the original film. They didn t need to make an expensive and tedious sequel in order to sell Tron merchandise. I would agree with your assessment of Tangled, though. It will probably be making Disney tons of money for years to come. I doubt that ll be the case for Fox and VDT. VDT didn t do as badly as a lot of people are makeing it out. The budget was 100 million and the spent an additional 50 million. They made 415 million. 415 million 150 million 265 million. That s not a bad profit. I wish I had 265 million Plus it also did beter then other movies. For example this weekened our family went to see Soul Surfer AWESOME movie by the way. It is beter then the adds make it out to be and after the movie when we got home I went and looked up the Soul Surfer numbers. It only made 32 million It deserves way more then that.